Abrams says no Trek alt timeline would’ve been a ‘big mistake’

The begining of all things newBy Nathalie Caron, Source: Blastr.com

J.J. Abrams’ 2009 Star Trek film did two major things right: It rebooted a tired-yet-beloved sci-fi franchise — injecting it with some kick-ass new life and even newer blood — while at the same time keeping almost 45 years of Trek history and lore relatively intact in the Prime timeline, by introducing a parallel one. Abrams agrees that not respecting what came before would’ve been ‘a big mistake.’

You gotta admit it: By pulling an ‘alternate timeline’ rabbit out of the hat, director/producer J.J. Abrams and writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman made a lot of Star Trek fans out there (us included) heave a huge sigh of relief. Canon was safe.

During a podcast interview with nerdist.com, Abrams discussed that alternate timeline and its effect on Star Trek: The Original Series (and, arguably, on Star Trek: The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine and Voyager as well. Only Star Trek: Enterprise’s history remains untouched since the series is set a century before the adventures of Kirk and Spock).

Here’s what Abrams said:

Here’s the thing… I think the key to that was, first of all, it was one of those things that not everyone even cares about or understands the timeline of it all. The notion that when this one character, Nero, arrives in his ship, that basically the timeline is altered at that moment, so everything forward is essentially an alternative timeline. That is not to say that everything that happened in The Original Series doesn’t exist. I think, as a fan of movies and shows, if someone told me the beloved thing for me was gone, I would be upset. But we didn’t do that. We’re not saying that what happened in that original series wasn’t good, true, valid, righteous and real. Let people embrace that. We’re not rejecting that. That, to me, would have been the big mistake. We’re simply saying that, “At this moment, the very first scene in the first movie, everything that people knew of Star Trek splits off into now another timeline.

Do you agree? Were you happy about the creation of a new, parallel/alternate timeline or did you just hate it?

ESO Network Sponsors

GEEK CHIC IS THE NEW … CHIC
COME TO THE GEEK SIDE. WE HAVE THE BEST SWAG

Support Us

A Dollar a month keeps us in orbit. Trust us it’s better that way.

Ways to Listen

Find Us Wherever Fine Podcasts are Found

Sign Up for the ESO Newsletter

WE HARDLY EVER SEND THEM OUT BUT WHEN WE DO THEY ARE AWESOME

ESO Network Archives

Archives

No matter where you go here you are

Follow the ESO Network

You didn't come this far to only come this far

Contact Us

    Remember any comment made today will be the tomorrow you worried about yesterday

    <-- see them in a pretty grid

    42 Cast
    The Best Saturdays of Our Lives
    Blurred Nerds
    But First, Let's Talk Nerdy
    Cigar Nerds
    The Con Guy
    Cosmic Pizza
    Dragon Con Report
    Drinking with Authors
    Earth Station DCU
    Earth Station One
    Earth Station Trek
    Earth Station Who
    Epsilon Three
    Flopcast
    Metal Geeks
    Modern Musicology
    Monkeeing Around
    Monster Attack
    The Monster Scifi Show
    Soul Forge
    Thunder Talk
    The Watch-a-thon of Rassilon